Romania: Taxation, fiscal issues and ways of inducing employment in European countries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Taxation, fiscal issues and ways of inducing employment in European countries

sofianu.jpg

Claudia Sofianu

After five years of economic turmoil and the return of recession in 2012, unemployment is hitting new peaks not seen for almost 20 years. Household income has declined and the risk of poverty is on the rise, especially in member states in southern and eastern Europe, according to the 2012 edition of the report issued by the European Commission on Employment and social developments in Europe. As part of the renewed Lisbon Strategy for growth and jobs, the Commission proposes an initiative aiming to improve workers' qualifications in accordance with the needs of European employers. It is based on a prospective analysis of labour market trends up to 2020.

As such, it seems there is still a great potential for creating jobs in Europe in the medium and long term, particularly replacement jobs because of the ageing population. Skills and qualification requirements will increase for all types and levels of occupation. Employers are looking in particular for competencies such as communication or analytical and problem-solving skills. The level of qualifications of the European workforce should meet the new needs of the labour market. This can be achieved by introducing active policies and by improving the effectiveness of education and training systems.

In addition, country-specific recommendations (including fiscal measures) have been issued by the Commission for the member states with the view of taking action for stability, growth and job creation during 2012-2013.

However, at national level, the amendments brought to tax and social security legislation for 2013 represent the culmination of several public spending cuts during 2012, as a reaction to both the economic and euro crisis. As such, most of the measures taken (as seen in countries like the Czech Republic, Slovakia, France, and the Netherlands) are aimed at reducing the national public budget deficit and will potentially increase employer costs, rather than representing fiscal incentives for increasing employment.

With regards to Romania, most of the amendments brought to fiscal legislation in January 2013 envisage the increase of the computation base for employment taxes (correlated with limitation of some tax free benefits). In addition, after five years since Romania joined the EU, the procedure for registering foreign employers has finally been issued with the view of paying social charges for their employees assigned to Romania in case no certificates of coverage can be obtained for them.

Considering all the above, it clearly appears that to meet the recommendations of the Commission, EU member states still have to set out ways to encourage hiring by reducing taxes on labour and/or supporting business start-ups more, instead of concentrating on reducing the public deficit through increasing employment costs.

Claudia Sofianu

Ernst & Young

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article