Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

besch.jpg

lehnen.jpg

Christoph Besch


Alexander Lehnen

Property conveyances are subject to a stamp duty (real estate transfer tax – RETT) of between 3.5% and 5.5% of the consideration. Substitute transactions are also subject to this tax, including share transfers leading to the accumulation of 95% or more of a property owning company's shares in a single hand. A similar rule applies to partnerships, though up to now there was no rule linking the two. This led to an avoidance mechanism, known as the RETT blocker. Provided the acquirer of a company was prepared to accept at least a very minor degree of minority interest in his company, he could purchase 94.9% through a wholly-owned company and the remaining 5.1% through a partnership in which he held a 94.9% interest.

No RETT was due as neither of the 95% thresholds were met. However, his effective ownership in the company owning the property amounted – in this example – to 99.7% (94.9% + 94.9%×5.1%).

On June 7, the Bundesrat put an end to this avoidance scheme with a provision in an omnibus tax amendment act combining the two thresholds into one overall effective ownership level. An effective transfer of 99.7% of the shares will thus trigger RETT no matter how it is split between vehicles. However, possibilities for relieving the RETT burden still exist, so intending investors still need to carefully consider alternative structures.

On the other hand, though, there is a compensation for those seeking to reorganise a group structure. The existing – though limited – exemption for transfers of shares within a group with no change in ultimate ownership has been extended to transfers of the property itself, provided there is no consideration other than shareholder's rights. There is now one less barrier to corporate reorganisations within Germany.

Christoph Besch (christoph.besch@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 1377
Alexander Lehnen (alexander.lehnen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 2136

PwC

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In-house teams who want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Gift this article