New Zealand: New Zealand to effect significant changes to taxation of foreign superannuation interests

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand to effect significant changes to taxation of foreign superannuation interests

neill-greg.jpg

Greg Neill, Russell McVeagh

Under existing law, New Zealand individuals with interests in foreign superannuation schemes may be subject to tax in respect of those interests on an accrual basis, rather than being taxed only on distributions from the scheme. In addition, the circumstances in which a distribution from such a scheme is taxable are presently uncertain. Because of this uncertainty, and the complexity of the rules, there has historically been a high level of non-compliance by New Zealand taxpayers in relation to their interests in foreign superannuation schemes.

The New Zealand government is therefore undertaking a law change which would see a shift to a new system under which taxpayers are subject to tax only on distributions from foreign superannuation schemes. The law change is reflected in the Taxation (Annual Rates, Foreign Superannuation, and Remedial Matters) Bill introduced in May 2013 and the changes will apply from the 2014-2015 income year.

Under the new system, a person will be taxed when they derive a "foreign superannuation withdrawal" from their foreign superannuation interest. Such a withdrawal includes any amount derived by the person from the scheme (whether by way of lump sum or periodic payment) or any amount transferred from a foreign scheme to a New Zealand or Australian superannuation scheme. Transfers to Australian schemes are included because withdrawals by New Zealand residents from Australian schemes are exempt from tax.

It is proposed that any person newly resident in New Zealand, or any person that has returned to New Zealand with a foreign superannuation interest acquired while non-resident, may receive a tax-free withdrawal of their interest if that withdrawal is made within 48 months of becoming resident in New Zealand.

If the withdrawal is subject to tax because of the expiry of the 48 month period, taxpayers have the option of applying either the default schedule method or the more involved formula method to calculate how much of the withdrawal is assessable. Both methods are designed to provide an approximation of the New Zealand tax that would have been payable had the person transferred their interest to a New Zealand scheme on the date they first became resident in New Zealand. The formula method allows taxpayers to use information specific to their foreign superannuation interest, whereas the schedule method requires taxpayers to apply a specified rate depending on how many income years have passed since they became resident in New Zealand.

The Bill also provides an effective amnesty for taxpayers who received lump sum distributions between January 1 2000 and March 31 2014 but did not comply with their tax obligations at the time. Those taxpayers have the choice of applying the law at the time of the distribution or being taxed on 15% of the distribution received.

The Bill addresses several of the initial concerns expressed in relation to the new proposals. For example, in relation to a transfer of funds from a foreign scheme to a New Zealand scheme, taxpayers will now be permitted access to such funds to pay any resulting tax liability. However, certain aspects remain problematic. For example, the use of a prospective period of amnesty is unusual given that the amnesty is there to address incidences of historical non-compliance.

The Bill is before the Select Committee and its report on the Bill is expected later this year.

Greg Neill (greg.neill@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 9 367 8879

Fax: +64 9 336 5010

Mobile: +64 21 0260 5417

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In-house teams who want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Gift this article