Switzerland: Impact of EU transparency directive on country-by-country reporting for Swiss businesses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Impact of EU transparency directive on country-by-country reporting for Swiss businesses

mcneil.jpg

drye.jpg

David McNeil


Sarah Drye

In April 2013, the Irish presidency of the EU secured agreement on a new accounting directive to increase the transparency of payments made to governments by European companies involved in extractive and forestry industries. The proposals will amend the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC) to require country-by-country reporting on payments made to governments including, among others, taxes on profit, licence fees and royalties.

While EU directives are not directly applicable to Switzerland, they are often taken into account by Swiss lawmakers when considering changes to Swiss law. Existing transparency initiatives – including the Dodd-Frank Act and the voluntary Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) – have attracted interest in the Swiss Federal Parliament and debate has already begun on the introduction of equivalent laws in Switzerland, most recently in the form of a parliamentary motion proposed on June 11.

Of particular interest for Swiss businesses is the scope of the Swiss initiative, which could impact companies trading extracted natural resources as well as those involved in the primary extraction itself.

Regardless of the final scope of any Swiss legal obligation in this area, it is likely that the pressure to improve transparency around tax will be felt by a much wider population of businesses as politicians, non-government organisations and increasingly the wider media, turn the spotlight on the contribution of multinationals to the economies of the countries in which they operate.

Compliance with transparency initiatives will have wide implications for processes and systems, particularly for those multinational groups who decentralise responsibility for tax, as is common for Swiss-based organisations.

For certain businesses, the requirement to report more information on taxes is likely to become an obligation. For others, additional voluntary disclosure could be a strategic choice in demonstrating commitment to conducting their tax affairs in a socially responsible manner.

David McNeil (damcneil@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 (0)58 279 8193
Sarah Drye (sdrye@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 (0) 58 279 8091

Deloitte

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article