China: The new China-Switzerland double taxation agreement

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: The new China-Switzerland double taxation agreement

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

Following the signing of a landmark free trade agreement in July 2013, China and Switzerland have signed a revised double taxation agreement and protocol (new DTA) on September 25 2013. The earliest possible effective date of the New DTA would be January 1 2014, although January 1 2015 would likely be the more realistic time frame subject to the timetable from ratification in the two countries. The new DTA introduces more favourable withholding tax treatment on dividends and royalty income. By way of comparison, the principal features of the New DTA are shown in Table 1.

Regarding capital gains, it is important to note that the new DTA limits the scope of capital gains tax exemption relief applicable on share disposals. The blanket relief on Chinese tax on gains on disposal of shares in a non-land rich Chinese tax resident enterprise (TRE) is no longer available under the new DTA. Instead, under the new DTA, China will have a right to impose a 10% tax on gains derived by a Swiss investor from the disposal of shares in a Chinese TRE if:

  • The Chinese TRE is a considered land-rich (that is more than 50% of the value of the company is derived directly or indirectly from immovable property situated in China); or

  • The Swiss investor, at any time during the twelve-month period preceding the disposal, had held directly or indirectly of at least 25% of the capital of the Chinese TRE.

In addition to the above, the new DTA expands the threshold period of a construction permanent establishment from six months to 12 months while the threshold period for a service PE has been revised to 183 days to align with other new DTAs recently concluded or re-negotiated by China.

Investors from China and Switzerland should evaluate the impact of the new DTA on their existing investment holding structure to assess whether the intended tax effectiveness would be sustainable going forward, and take into consideration the same when structuring future investments in both countries.

Table 1


Existing DTA

New DTA

Dividends

10% in all cases

5% if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company which directly holds at least 25% of the capital of the company paying the dividends;

10% in all other cases

Exemption specifically granted to institution or fund wholly owned by that State: in the case of China, the China Investment Corporation (CIC) and the National Council for Social Security Fund

Specific limitation of benefit clause introduced (note 1)

Royalties (on licenses and rental of industrial/commercial/scientific equipment.)

10%

9%

Specific limitation of benefit clause introduced (note 1)

Note 1: The specific limitation of benefit clause is introduced to deny the beneficial tax treatment accorded under the New DTA, where the main purpose of the income recipient is to take advantage of the reduced withholding tax rate or a tax relief on capital gains derived.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg saw the highest increase in tax-to-GDP ratio out of OECD countries in 2023, according to the organisation’s new Revenue Statistics report
Ryan’s VAT practice leader for Europe tells ITR about promoting kindness, playing the violincello and why tax being boring is a ‘ridiculous’ idea
Technology is on the way to relieve tax advisers tired by onerous pillar two preparations, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
A high number of granted APAs demonstrates the Italian tax authorities' commitment to resolving TP issues proactively, experts say
Malta risks ceding tax revenues to jurisdictions that adopt the global minimum tax sooner, the IMF said
The UK and what has been dubbed its ‘second empire’ have been found to be responsible for 26% of all countries’ tax losses by the Tax Justice Network
Ireland offers more than just its competitive corporate tax environment but a reduction in the US rate under a Trump administration could affect the country, experts tell ITR
The ‘big four’ firm was originally prohibited from tendering for government work until December 1 due to its tax leaks scandal, but ongoing investigations into the matter have seen the date extended
Approximately 74% of MAP cases in 2023 reached a full resolution, but new transfer pricing MAP cases fell by 16%
Brazil is looking to impose the OECD’s 15% global minimum tax on multinationals; in other news, PwC is set to pull out of Fiji
Gift this article