New Greek transfer pricing guidance provides clarity

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Greek transfer pricing guidance provides clarity

Greece’s Finance Minister has issued a ministerial decision that provides guidance on the contents of the transfer pricing documentation file, the parties subject to the transfer pricing rules and exemptions , language requirements, transfer pricing documentation methods, and the content of the summary information table.

The new ministerial decision – POL 1097, issued April 9 2014 - is to a great extent similar to a previous decision (POL 1179/2013), which provided guidance and clarifications on Greek transfer pricing rules and documentation requirements under the previous tax regime (Income Tax Code - L.2238/1994). The older decision is still applicable for fiscal years ending on or before December 31 2013.

Deadline for the submission of the summary information table

According to the new ministerial decision, the deadline for submission of the summary information table (SIT) remains the end of the fourth month following the taxpayer’s fiscal year end, in accordance with the provisions of article 21 paragraph 3 of Law 4174/2013.

The SIT may only be filed electronically on the webpage of the General Secretariat of Information Systems (GSIS) of the Greek Ministry of Finance.

Submission of the SIT requires the use of a special application (xml file), which is provided by the Ministry of Finance, and should meet the specifications set by the Ministry in the new decision’s appendix, also available on the GSIS website.

The SIT is attached to the Greek transfer pricing file and is filed electronically with the tax authorities merely for information purposes. The SIT should not be considered as complete and sufficient transfer pricing documentation that supports the compliance of the taxpayer’s intragroup transactions with the arm’s-length principle.

Companies and transactions subject to documentation requirements

The new ministerial decision states that the intra-group transactions and transfer of functions entered into by domestic legal entities that fall under the scope of article 2 L.4172 (Greek sociétés anonymes, limited liability companies, private companies, cooperatives, associations, foundations, consortia, etcetera), are subject to transfer pricing documentation requirements.

Exemptions from the transfer pricing documentation obligation are available in the following cases:

· Intra-group transactions or transfers of functions with one or more related parties not exceeding €100,000 ($140,000) annually and in total, provided the taxpayer’s turnover during the fiscal year does not exceed €5,000,000.

· Intra-group transactions or transfers of functions with one or more related parties not exceeding €200,000 annually and in total, provided the taxpayer’s turnover during the fiscal year exceeds €5,000,000.

· Commercial/industrial special purpose companies established under the provisions of Law 89/1967 are exempt from the transfer pricing documentation obligation because these companies already document their intercompany transactions through the pre-approval of their cost plus method.

If the intercompany transactions or transfers of functions (in total and not per category of transaction or per counterparty) exceed the €100,000/€200,000 thresholds annually, then the documentation requirement is triggered for every separate intragroup transaction or transfer of function, irrespective of its value.

Transfer pricing documentation file

Under the Code of Tax Procedures, taxpayers must prepare the transfer pricing documentation file within four months following the end of their fiscal year.

The transfer pricing file must be kept at the taxpayer’s premises, according to the provisions of the Code of Tax Recording Transactions.

The transfer pricing documentation file must be made available to the tax authorities within 30 days following a request.

Special chapter on market conditions changes

An important provision of this ministerial decision is the newly enacted obligation to include a “special chapter” in the transfer pricing documentation file, whereby the taxpayer is required to describe all facts and events of the prior fiscal year that have an impact on the information and data included in the file and that are due to market conditions changes.

The taxpayer may also use the existing transfer pricing documentation file to cover the next fiscal year’s transfer pricing documentation requirements, provided that file is updated and includes all necessary changes. The taxpayer must disclose all the sections of the existing documentation file that were updated with relation to the previous fiscal year.

The documentation file must be updated within four months following the end of the fiscal year.

Incomplete or inadequate documentation

Under POL 1097/9.4.2014, a transfer pricing documentation file will be considered incomplete or inadequate by the local tax authorities if, during the course of an audit, it is not possible for the auditor to verify the correctness of the calculations or the transfer pricing documentation methods used, even after additional information has been provided to the auditor.

When the documentation file is deemed incomplete or inadequate, a one-off penalty is calculated at the rate of 1% on the taxpayer’s revenues during the fiscal year under review, including any adjustments to the taxpayer’s profits. This penalty cannot be less than €10,000 or more than €100,000.

Author:

Eftichia Piligou, epiligou@deloitte.gr

Tax principal, transfer pricing,

Deloitte Business Solutions Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article