India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s CBDT asks ITAT and DRP to apply Vodafone ruling to similar transfer pricing cases

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has requested that Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) and dispute resolution panels (DRP) apply the principle behind the Bombay High Court’s Vodafone ruling for similar transfer pricing cases.

As a result, the income tax department will not be able to make transfer pricing adjustments on the shares issued by Indian units to their overseas parents.

On January 28, the Union Cabinet decided to accept the Bombay High Court’s ruling in Vodafone’s transfer pricing case.

The cabinet came to the conclusion that the transaction between Vodafone and its Mauritius subsidiary was on the capital account and that there was no income to be chargeable to tax; therefore, applying any pricing formula was irrelevant.

In addition, the Cabinet agreed to accept “orders of courts/ITAT/DRP in cases of other taxpayers where similar transfer pricing adjustments have been made and the courts/ITAT/DRP have decided/decide in favour of the taxpayer”.

This decision is expected to facilitate tax compliance and reduce litigation on similar issues.

“This is a major correction of a tax matter which has adversely affected investor sentiment,” read Prime Minister Modi’s website.

Positive outlook

In line with recent efforts to create a more stable tax environment in India, the cabinet’s decision is expected to provide greater clarity and predictability for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

India has long been associated with an aggressive tax policy and lengthy transfer pricing disputes. This decision will come as welcome news to taxpayers who have found themselves embroiled in court battles.

The ruling is also bound to be beneficial for India’s economy. The government is aiming to “set at rest the uncertainty prevailing in the minds of foreign investors and taxpayers in respect of possible transfer pricing adjustments in India on transactions related to issuance of shares, and thereby improve the investment climate in the country”.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article