Treading water

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Treading water

editorial

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water.

Achieving transparency, whether as a taxpayer or tax authority, can often feel like you are treading water. When it feels like you are getting closer to the shore, another wave of proposals, each with new rules and threats of controversy pushing you out into open water.

Internal procedures, data gathering, analytics, and clear policies all play a key part in achieving transparency. However, transparency initiatives are vulnerable to subjective judgements (page six).

Nevertheless, companies are often accused of pursuing the lowest effective tax rate possible. Many companies are now focused on educating tax authorities, stakeholders and the public to explain how they pay their taxes (page 74). Meanwhile, The B Team has found a framework that it believes could work for many large businesses (page 20).

Many reading this will argue that this is a problem for taxpayers as they aim to comply and protect their business reputation. However, tax authorities are dealing with the same challenges.

Country-by-country reporting (CbCR) and the automatic exchange of information (AEOI) are just two transparency initiatives where it is not entirely clear how governments are analysing and using the data. There are still deep trust issues partly because of this. Furthermore, if tax authorities are viewed as more aggressive and less trustworthy, taxpayers will be ever-more cautious about how open they are with their tax affairs.

It's a vicious circle between taxpayer and tax authorities, but what makes it tougher are tax justice networks fighting for more transparency and fairness. Despite the CbCR and AEOI initiatives being introduced, it's not enough for some non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and they continue to push the debate further (page 40). These networks, while performing an essential service, are not letting taxpayers and governments rest.

No matter what policies are put in place, it seems the water beneath our feet is always getting deeper as NGOs push the boundaries. Many will be trying to stay afloat and avoid getting lost at sea.

Anjana Haines
Managing editor, International Tax Review
anjana.haines@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article