Looking ahead - KPMG's China Special Focus launched

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Looking ahead - KPMG's China Special Focus launched

A series of important changes are underway in China

As the Chinese zodiac cycle moves into a new 12-year cycle, the changes across the tax landscape are transitioning in a similar fashion.

As the Chinese zodiac cycle moves into a new 12-year cycle, the changes across the tax landscape are transitioning in a similar fashion.

The ninth edition of KPMG's China – Looking Ahead chronicles a busy a year. It also provides an insight into how the tax policies are being designed to interact with international developments. In the following chapters, KPMG's experts explain how tax policy is evolving in mainland China and Hong Kong SAR.

2020 is the Year of the Rat, an animal that is believed to be clever and successful – much like the innovative data and analytics techniques being developed by the State Taxation Administration. There also has been a shift from document-based analysis carried out by tax auditors, to more efficient digital tools. This guide's VAT chapters make some bold predictions about how data and analytics will grow stronger in the coming year, indicating how taxpayers may need to adapt.

With the year of the rat also symbolising wealth and surplus, it is apt that the Chinese government is continuing its efforts to open the economy to inbound and outbound investment – particularly as part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). However, this guide's outbound chapter, as well as the chapters on Hong Kong SAR, M&A and R&D, covers the tax challenges Chinese companies face along the BRI countries.

Separately, achieving the quiet and peaceful life that the rat represents may be difficult amid continuing trade tensions with the US and disagreements across the Inclusive Framework on how to tax the digital economy. This guide's digital economy chapters dive into China's high-tech sector and how look inward at domestic tax law and administration issues to be resolved for the country's digital industry.

Meanwhile, the topics of customs and trade policies, as well the evolution of transfer pricing arrangements and tax treaties are explored across a range of chapters.

The past 12 years and the 2019 Year of the Pig have been eventful, but the momentum will continue into 2020. We hope that the ninth edition of KPMG's China – Looking Ahead will be a valuable tool in guiding you through the developments.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article