Chile: Government and Senate’s Finance Commission agree on a range of tax changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Government and Senate’s Finance Commission agree on a range of tax changes

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
li-chile-as175484925.jpg

Mauricio Valenzuela and Santiago Tubio of PwC outline the main amendments put forward by the executive branch to increase Chilean tax efficiency.

On November 8 2019, the Chilean government reached an agreement with the Senate's Finance Commission to introduce amendments to the 2018 Modernisation Tax Bill (under discussion in the Chilean Senate).

The aim of the tax agreement is to encourage growth, investment, entrepreneurships, savings and employment. It is expected that some of the amendment will be introduced in a separate tax bill within 2020. Proposed amendments are expected to be implemented with the objective to:

i) Strengthen tax collection and increase tax revenues, to be in position to finance the government's new social agenda;

ii) Introduce tax benefits/reliefs to senior population; and

iii) Introduce incentives/reliefs and simplification rules for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

The main highlights of the tax agreement are as follows:

  • Full integration of corporate-level tax and final taxes: According to the agreement, the full integration of corporate-level tax and final taxes proposed in the 2018 Modernisation Tax Bill for all companies, will be limited only to SMEs whose sales do not exceed $2.8 million annually. The partially integrated method would remain for the companies exceeding such threshold – i.e. large enterprise.

  • Progressive repeal of payments per absorbed profits (PPUA): In a Chile-to-Chile profit distribution, the distribution goes with a corporate income tax (CIT) credit attached to be used against final taxes (e.g. Chilean additional withholding tax – 35%). When the Chilean recipient entity is in a tax loss position, profits received offset existing tax losses. In that scenario, the recipient entity is entitled to claim the refund (PPUA) of the CIT credit attached to the profit absorbed.The tax agreement proposes to gradually repeal the ability to request a tax refund for the CIT paid by its subsidiaries domiciled in Chile in the event the holding company is in a tax loss position.

  • New real estate tax: A new real estate tax would be incorporated. Real estate with a fiscal value of $600,000 or more should be subject to tax. The tax would be included as a surcharge of the current real estate contributions on a progressive basis. It ranges from a 0.075% rate up to a 0.275% rate.

  • Private investment fund (FIP): The agreement introduces new requirements for FIPs to be incorporated (e.g. minimum of eight unrelated related parties not being able to hold a 20% or more interest in the FIP). Limitations are also introduced to the use of market maker agreements and the tax benefits arising from the disposal of fund's quotas, listed in a stock exchange market (actively traded exemption).

The Ministry of Finance is now preparing a draft of the agreement in order to submit it to the Chilean Congress for discussion. Through the above-mentioned measures, the government expects to collect $2 billion more, in order to satisfy the social requests.

This is a developing news, so multinationals with Chilean subsidiaries should closely monitor the measures and determine how it may affect their operations in Chile.

PwC
T: +56 2 29400635 
E: mauricio.valenzuela@pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article