The effects and opportunities of ending a business in Chile

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The effects and opportunities of ending a business in Chile

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms

Gregorio Martinez and Fernando Binder of PwC Chile explore the development and advantages of Chile’s unique end of business tax.

A topic which businesses sometimes forget to analyse when investing in a country are the tax effects associated with closing a business. In Chile, this is a relevant matter given that: (i) taxes are due, (ii) there are advantages to be had, and, (iii) businesses may no longer be left dormant postponing the end of business tax.

In light of this, Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms, which has generated different tax effects to those which had previously been produced.




When a business is closed, a 35% rate end of business tax is due. This tax is a replacement of final taxes (additional tax or global complementary tax) which would levy any profit distribution.



The end of business tax is determined through a formula that considers the tax equity less profits not subject to taxes less capital contributions. This means that it will not only levy taxable profits, but it may also levy financial profits.



There is a credit to be had for the corporate income tax paid by the entity, which may amount up to 27%. The amounts levied with end of business tax are not subject to any other income tax.



Following the above, the end of business tax may be compared with the taxation of profit distributions, if all assets were distributed, but here lays the major difference and opportunity. 



An asset distribution is considered to be an alienation; thus, it needs to be performed at fair market value triggering a corresponding capital gain based in the difference between the tax basis and the fair market value. In the case of end of business, by express disposition of the law, assets are to be assigned to the shareholders at tax basis.



This means that assets may be transferred to the shareholders, local or foreign, at tax basis without triggering any capital gain, disregarding any possible differences between fair market value and tax basis. 



In addition to the above, dormant entities are no longer a viable option in Chile, since the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has, for some time already, had the faculty to close a dormant business and apply the corresponding taxes.



Then, end of business may trigger tax payments, but it also represents a moment of opportunities, that although we are of the opinion that should be considered before performing an investment, it is never too late to review and prepare as a way out of a business.

The ability to transfer the assets at tax basis positions the end of business tax as a relevant alternative compared to profit distributions or sale of the entity/assets, where an analysis of each case would be required to determine the most convenient alternative.

A topic which businesses sometimes forget to analyse when investing in a country are the tax effects associated with closing a business. In Chile, this is a relevant matter given that: (i) taxes are due, (ii) there are advantages to be had, and, (iii) businesses may no longer be left dormant postponing the end of business tax.

In light of this, Chilean tax legislation has been subject to important changes during the last tax reforms, which has generated different tax effects to those which had previously been produced.




When a business is closed, a 35% rate end of business tax is due. This tax is a replacement of final taxes (additional tax or global complementary tax) which would levy any profit distribution.



The end of business tax is determined through a formula that considers the tax equity less profits not subject to taxes less capital contributions. This means that it will not only levy taxable profits, but it may also levy financial profits.



There is a credit to be had for the corporate income tax paid by the entity, which may amount up to 27%. The amounts levied with end of business tax are not subject to any other income tax.



Following the above, the end of business tax may be compared with the taxation of profit distributions, if all assets were distributed, but here lays the major difference and opportunity. 



An asset distribution is considered to be an alienation; thus, it needs to be performed at fair market value triggering a corresponding capital gain based in the difference between the tax basis and the fair market value. In the case of end of business, by express disposition of the law, assets are to be assigned to the shareholders at tax basis.



This means that assets may be transferred to the shareholders, local or foreign, at tax basis without triggering any capital gain, disregarding any possible differences between fair market value and tax basis. 



In addition to the above, dormant entities are no longer a viable option in Chile, since the Chilean Internal Revenue Service has, for some time already, had the faculty to close a dormant business and apply the corresponding taxes.



Then, end of business may trigger tax payments, but it also represents a moment of opportunities, that although we are of the opinion that should be considered before performing an investment, it is never too late to review and prepare as a way out of a business.

The ability to transfer the assets at tax basis positions the end of business tax as a relevant alternative compared to profit distributions or sale of the entity/assets, where an analysis of each case would be required to determine the most convenient alternative.

PwC Chile

T: +56 2 29400633

Fernando Binder: fernando.binder@cl.pwc.com

Gregorio Martinez: gregorio.martinez@cl.pwc.com 



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article