Switzerland: New rules on inter-cantonal tax allocation established

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: New rules on inter-cantonal tax allocation established

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The Swiss tax reform has brought in fresh changes

Daniel Stutzmann and Manuel Angehrn of Deloitte Switzerland consider how the Swiss tax reform has led Swiss cantons to move towards a ‘function-based’ tax approach.

Following the implementation of the Swiss tax reform into applicable tax law on January 1 2020 and the abolishment of the preferential tax regime, Swiss cantons have established new rules to attribute profits amongst Swiss cantons in connection with the application of benefits provided by the reform.

Based on the long-standing practice established by the Swiss Supreme Court to avoid double taxation within Switzerland based on quotas or direct allocation, the rules allow for the appropriate determination of a profit allocation in the case of multiple locations within Switzerland. This change is in connection with the benefits derived from the Swiss tax reform. Circular letter No. 34 dated January 15 2020 outlines cases and possibilities to make use of the Swiss tax reform within an inter-cantonal context. 



Depending on the approach taken by a tax payer (direct allocation by the way of permanent establishment (PE) accounts or indirect allocation by way of quotas), cantons are required to determine the taxable profit subject to cantonal and communal tax. This will be based on their tax laws and influence their ability to grant incentives, even in cases where functions are subject to a benefit which are not performed within the canton.



The rules address the change from a mere ‘legal entity’ approach of taxation towards a ‘function-based’ taxation. Furthermore, the limitation of benefit introduced as part of the Swiss tax reform and the way limitations are shared among the cantons is defined in detail. Thus, taxpayers may need to revisit their existing legal structure and assess the impact of a likely preferential combination of research and development (R&D) entities with manufacturing, sales or distribution entities and their preferred allocation approach to fully utilise potential R&D tax incentives granted by a Swiss canton, even in case the respective activities are located in a different canton. 



Considering that tax is a deductible expense in Switzerland, the changed rules require a taxpayer to have clarity on the benefits to be applied for in the tax return prior to the business year-end. Accordingly, action in advance of the year-end is highly recommended and required.



The combination of entities and functions within a single Swiss legal entity not only makes sense from a domestic perspective, but – considering the possibilities of a transition regime or the possible R&D activities in Switzerland – could allow corporations to shelter additional profit with benefits derived from Swiss R&D.





Daniel Stutzmann

T: +41 58 279 6307

E: dstutzmann@deloitte.ch



Manuel Angehrn

T: +41 58 279 7279

E: maangehrn@deloitte.ch



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article