Romania: Is there a better time to ask for a VAT refund?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Is there a better time to ask for a VAT refund?

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
Tax authorities have relaxed rules as a result of the pandemic

Alex Milcev and Costin Manta of EY Romania explain how tax authorities have relaxed conditions for granting VAT refunds in order to boost liquidity.

Companies facing VAT refund positions are trapped between the need of cash, especially during this period, and the stress of having to go through a VAT audit. A selected few companies were eligible for a quick VAT refund (e.g. large and midsized taxpayers with a low tax risk), receiving their money back before a VAT audit was performed, thus granting them quick access to the much-needed cash.



The economic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic has determined the tax authorities to relax the conditions for granting the VAT refund, in an effort to secure liquidity on the market. Many of the companies who did not qualify for the simplified procedure, do qualify now. There are some simple criteria, such as companies who have a clean tax record, as well as small companies who are not at their first VAT refund request or did not carry forward the refundable VAT for more than 12 months. Such companies are eligible to get their refund with a subsequent VAT audit (not with a prior one, as the general rule was before the pandemic). The validity of this facility lasts during the state of emergency and 30 days after (up to June 13 2020). Companies facing a VAT refund position are in the best position to request their money back.



One of the most frequent excuses for not requesting the refund is that the tax authorities will perform a VAT audit. Under the current context, it is likely that most companies will not have to go through a VAT audit immediately, as they will first be approved the refund and afterwards the tax authorities will decide if an audit is necessary. It is not certain an audit will be performed at all, as this will depend on a risk analysis. If the high level explanations provided to the tax authorities during the risk analysis process are convincing enough, the refund may not trigger an audit at all.



What if a company expects that they will be assessed additional tax liabilities during a tax audit?



If companies are aware of potential additional tax liabilities to be assessed by the tax authorities, it is also a good time to make the necessary corrections. The taxpayer has the option to make any correction voluntarily in its tax statements until December 15 2020 without having to pay late payment charges (which can go up to 36.5% per year). This can be done thanks to the tax amnesty in force. 



Thus, taxpayers can pay any tax liabilities which were due up to March 31 2020 without additional costs, such as late payment interest or late payment penalty. If these corrections are made voluntarily, the risks for the Romanian tax authorities to assess additional late payment charges during a future VAT audit significantly decrease.



Can we include the VAT related to bad debts in the VAT refund request?



Although the refund positions are usually triggered by large investments or applying the zero-rated VAT exemptions on the supplies, reversing the VAT incurred in relation to bad debts can also be a trigger for a refund position.



Thus, in the current context available only for a short period of time, it may be worthwhile to also include in the refund request the VAT related to bad debts, given the expected quick turnaround.

This window of opportunity closes within approximately three weeks, so it may be the time to act. By the time this opportunity closes, the April and May VAT returns could be submitted, asking the VAT refund.

Alex Milcev

E: alex.milcev@ro.ey.com



Costin Manta

E: costin.manta@ro.ey.com



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article