Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
The case has corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners outline the corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications of the Central Revenue’s decision.

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian permanent establishment (PE) to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). This is the conclusion reached by the Central Revenue, as an answer to the request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020.

Circumstances of the case

The case concerned an EU company (hereinafter ALFA) which intended to transfer its PE in Italy (hereinafter ALFA Italy PE) to the BETA company resident in another country of the EU, against of the issue of shares by BETA.

In particular, all active and passive assets of ALFA Italy PE were to flow entirely into a new PE, also in Italy, of the conferring subject, BETA.

Subsequently, the transferring company ALFA would carry out the distribution of profits in kind (corresponding to the investment in BETA, received against the aforementioned business contribution) in favour of its parent company GAMMA.

Accordingly, the Italian PE of ALFA would be transferred to BETA, and ALFA group will continue the activity in Italy, as well as in the other member states, where similar operations will be carried out.

Opinion of the Central Revenue

The Central Revenue expressed its opinion on the case considering the tax treatment in terms of corporate income tax (IRES), VAT and registration tax.

IRES

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian PE to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). However, if the shareholding acquired as a result of the contribution:

  • Is assigned to the ‘contributing’ PE and then transferred to its parent company; or

  • Is assigned directly (upon contribution) to the parent company; or

  • Is not functionally connected with the PE; or

  • the capital gain, if any, realised by the ‘contributing’ PE is taxable, possibly under the PEX regime if the conditions are met (Italian tax authority, answer to request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020).

VAT

From the point of view of the applicable VAT regime, the transfer of the business unit consisting of the assets and liabilities constituting the Italian PE of ALFA, in favour of the new PE in Italy of BETA, is excluded from the field of application of VAT, pursuant to Article 2, paragraph 3, letter (b), of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972.

In this regard, Article 19-bis2, paragraph 7, of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972 obliges the taxable person beneficiary of business contribution to rectify the VAT deduction, if the conditions are met.

Registration tax

For the purposes of registration tax, considering that the business contribution is excluded from the field of application of VAT, it must be subject to registration tax according to Article 2, paragraph 1, letter (d), of the Presidential Decree No. 131 of 1986 (TUR), by virtue of the principle of VAT-register, alternatively referred to in Article 40 of the TUR.

In regard to the extent of the registration tax to be applied, it is necessary to refer to Article 4, paragraph 1, letter (b) of the Tariff, Part I, of the TUR, which establishes the application of the registration tax in a fixed amount. 

 

Gian Luca Nieddu

Partner

E: gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it

Barbara Scampuddu

Partner

E: barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Staff will be required to spend 60% of their time with clients or in the office, it is understood
Fears that advisers would have to disclose sensitive mental health information to prospective clients were addressed, but Australian tax bodies still harbour worries
Partners in EY’s tax advisory practice have also reportedly been dismissed; in other news, PwC has lost another Chinese auditing client in the wake of the Evergrande matter
Labour’s anticipated plans to reform the UK’s corporation tax regime presents a timely opportunity, a debate featuring former UK Treasury minister David Gauke heard last night
The masterminds behind an ‘unusual’ advertisement launched by six Australian tax associations against controversial ethical rules won’t reveal the campaign’s costs
White & Case’s tax controversy head discusses how to stop a dispute before it starts and shares insights from a significant TP case with the IRS
John Ball is currently serving as a managing director at Google, based in Sydney
The full-page advertisements are running ahead of a key summit with the government on Friday, but ITR understands some professional bodies see the campaign as counterproductive
US calls for talks with Canada over digital service tax, Argentina cuts withholding taxes, and more
The ‘big four’ firms want guidance on reporting forms, the use of the XBRL filing mechanism, and permanent establishment reporting
Gift this article