Navigating the global tax disputes landscape

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Navigating the global tax disputes landscape

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
lighthouse-1313047.jpg

Aldo Mariani of KPMG International presents the key findings from an extensive survey of tax dispute professionals regarding the trends and developments in today’s tax environment, and how authorities are adjusting their approach.

The rise of tax authority activity

KPMG has produced a special report that takes an in-depth look at tax authorities worldwide and the global environment that in-house taxpayers are navigating today.

Based on an extensive survey of tax dispute professionals from KPMG firms, this report examines the trends and developments shaping the current environment and how tax authorities respond. Overall, the survey results show that companies are seeing a significant rise in tax audits and disputes, and all signs point towards even more intense tax authority activity in the future.

Click here to download the survey.

About the survey

The report charts the evolution of leading tax departments and identifies operational benchmarks for high-performing tax teams. It highlights the survey’s findings about issues facing tax authorities that include people, processes, and technology deployed by tax departments to manage their activities related to tax audits and disputes.

The findings in the report are based on a survey of over 115 tax dispute professionals from KPMG firms in 49 jurisdictions worldwide.

About 40% of respondents deal primarily with international companies, while 35% most commonly work with large domestic companies. The remaining respondents are focused on small business clients (15%) and individual clients (10%).

Key findings

  • Audit activity has been rising across the board for most taxes, with a special focus on multinational groups and large domestic taxpayers;

  • Audits are being approached more aggressively, and tax authorities seem more likely to employ harder-hitting powers to gather information, such as asserting formal access rights, conducting formal interviews and issuing summonses;

  • New and increased tax penalties are being enacted, and tax authorities seem to be applying them, as well as existing penalties, more frequently;

  • Technology is helping tax authorities to improve the evaluation of enormous volumes of available data that can help to identify and address significant compliance risks;

  • Disputes can be resolved through settlement in most jurisdictions, although many tax authorities tend to propose significant adjustments and expect taxpayers to concede the disputed amount; and

  • Critical factors influencing settlement include the amount of funds at stake, the impact of the available evidence, and the risk of litigation.

Read the original version of the article on KPMG’s website.

Click here to access more KPMG Future of Tax content.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article