Australian tax leaks scandal could be a police matter

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian tax leaks scandal could be a police matter

Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany - September 26, 2021: Logo of pw

Police could be poised to investigate the leak of confidential tax information plans by partners at PwC Australia.

The Australian government said today, May 22, that further steps will be taken in response to the tax leaks at PwC and that this matter may be referred to the Australian Federal Police.

Partners at the accounting firm have been implicated in sharing confidential information about upcoming anti-tax avoidance measures. It’s alleged that PwC partners shared such information with clients to get new business.

“We’ve got Treasury looking at an investigation into what has occurred, and looking at whether criminal charges should be referred to the AFP,” Stephen Jones, assistant treasurer and minister for financial services, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

PwC Australia CEO Tom Seymour stepped down on May 9 over the scandal. An independent inquiry has been launched and Seymour is set to retire in September when the results of the investigation will be published.

Kristin Stubbins, acting interim CEO, said: “We are committed to learning from our mistakes and ensuring that we embrace the high standards of governance, culture and accountability that our people, clients and external stakeholders rightly expect.”

PwC Australia has had a controversial first half of the year since Peter-John Collins, former head of international tax at the firm, received a two-year ban for sharing government information with colleagues and clients.

Seymour released a statement on May 15 stating that he was one of the partners who had received private information via an email chain, reported the Australian Financial Review.

The unravelling of this case has caused an uproar from the Australian government. Treasurer Jim Chalmers branded the scandal a “shocking breach of trust”, while some legal professionals have called for a ban on PwC obtaining government contracts.

“Flogging off the confidential information to make a buck is not consistent with the sort of good faith that we want to see when we consult business on changes, whether it’s tax changes or other changes,” added Chalmers.

The Australian firm has now lost three leadership figures to the scandal: partners Pete Calleja and Sean Gregory stepped down from the executive board after Seymour gave up his position as CEO.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article