Pension funds freeze PwC contracts over Australian tax leaks

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pension funds freeze PwC contracts over Australian tax leaks

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JULY 30, 2018: PwC headquarters building

Five Australian pension funds representing more than A$750 billion in savings have frozen contracts with PwC Australia, in reaction to the tax leaks scandal.

PwC Australia has lost out on new deals with a growing list of superannuation funds since the tax leaks scandal engulfed the ‘big four’ firm.

One such fund, Aware Super, decided to temporarily freeze new contracts with the firm on Friday, June 9. A spokesperson explained: “We’re deeply disappointed by the reported failures of governance, accountability and culture at PwC.

“We look forward to the full extent of this issue being promptly investigated and addressed,” said the spokesperson.

AustralianSuper was the first major pension fund – with A$270 billion ($182 billion) in assets – to freeze new contracts with PwC on June 2, but several companies have since initiated reviews over the scandal.

Aware Super, Australian Retirement Trust, CareSuper and Hesta have followed AustralianSuper’s decision to freeze contracts with PwC Australia. These super funds collectively hold more than A$750 billion in retirement savings.

Meanwhile, LegalSuper and Rest Super are reviewing their arrangements with the firm, and Cbus and Hostplus are reportedly monitoring developments closely. Most of the Australian pension industry relies on the big four firms for audit and tax services.

Each company needs two firms to handle internal and external audits separately. This may mean super funds will turn to PwC’s rivals for new contracts.

PwC Australia has so far not commented on the decisions of these clients.

Tax leaks scandal

The scandal initially erupted after it was discovered that Peter-John Collins, former head of international tax at PwC Australia, had sent confidential emails detailing legislative changes on tax avoidance to colleagues between 2015 and 2016.

Collins retired in October 2022, but the scandal broke in January this year. He was later banned by Australia’s tax industry watchdog, the Tax Practitioners Board, on January 23.

PwC Australia CEO Tom Seymour stepped down on May 8 2023 after it was confirmed that he had received information from Collins. He later announced his plan to retire in September.

The Australian Federal Police launched a criminal investigation into Collins on May 24, before PwC Australia suspended nine unnamed partners on May 29.

Last week, in a letter to the Australian Senate, PwC named all 67 members of staff who received confidential information by email.

The big four firm is conducting an internal inquiry, and there is an independent review set to conclude in September.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article