Pension funds freeze PwC contracts over Australian tax leaks

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pension funds freeze PwC contracts over Australian tax leaks

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - JULY 30, 2018: PwC headquarters building

Five Australian pension funds representing more than A$750 billion in savings have frozen contracts with PwC Australia, in reaction to the tax leaks scandal.

PwC Australia has lost out on new deals with a growing list of superannuation funds since the tax leaks scandal engulfed the ‘big four’ firm.

One such fund, Aware Super, decided to temporarily freeze new contracts with the firm on Friday, June 9. A spokesperson explained: “We’re deeply disappointed by the reported failures of governance, accountability and culture at PwC.

“We look forward to the full extent of this issue being promptly investigated and addressed,” said the spokesperson.

AustralianSuper was the first major pension fund – with A$270 billion ($182 billion) in assets – to freeze new contracts with PwC on June 2, but several companies have since initiated reviews over the scandal.

Aware Super, Australian Retirement Trust, CareSuper and Hesta have followed AustralianSuper’s decision to freeze contracts with PwC Australia. These super funds collectively hold more than A$750 billion in retirement savings.

Meanwhile, LegalSuper and Rest Super are reviewing their arrangements with the firm, and Cbus and Hostplus are reportedly monitoring developments closely. Most of the Australian pension industry relies on the big four firms for audit and tax services.

Each company needs two firms to handle internal and external audits separately. This may mean super funds will turn to PwC’s rivals for new contracts.

PwC Australia has so far not commented on the decisions of these clients.

Tax leaks scandal

The scandal initially erupted after it was discovered that Peter-John Collins, former head of international tax at PwC Australia, had sent confidential emails detailing legislative changes on tax avoidance to colleagues between 2015 and 2016.

Collins retired in October 2022, but the scandal broke in January this year. He was later banned by Australia’s tax industry watchdog, the Tax Practitioners Board, on January 23.

PwC Australia CEO Tom Seymour stepped down on May 8 2023 after it was confirmed that he had received information from Collins. He later announced his plan to retire in September.

The Australian Federal Police launched a criminal investigation into Collins on May 24, before PwC Australia suspended nine unnamed partners on May 29.

Last week, in a letter to the Australian Senate, PwC named all 67 members of staff who received confidential information by email.

The big four firm is conducting an internal inquiry, and there is an independent review set to conclude in September.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article