How to manage ESG, value chains, and transfer pricing considerations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How to manage ESG, value chains, and transfer pricing considerations

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_crowe_valente.jpg
city-1799656.jpg

Carola Valente of Crowe Valente/Valente Associati GEB Partners explains why ESG goals and requirements are intertwined with transfer pricing, and how multinationals can mitigate the associated risks throughout value chains

ESG considerations are transversal in all value chains and impact not only companies captured within the threshold set forth in new regulatory initiatives such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) but also SMEs.

SMEs play a vital role in the value chain of larger companies, serving as suppliers, subcontractors, or business partners and providing goods or services. With the introduction of the CSRD, SMEs will be required to disclose and adhere to sustainability standards set by the large enterprise they collaborate with.

Major corporations and multinational organisations already demand their suppliers meet specific ESG criteria, including environmental standards, ethical labour practices, and transparent policies.

Non-compliance with sustainability requirements not only exposes SMEs to legal and financial risks but can also result in their removal from the supply chain, leading to significant social consequences. On the other hand, adhering to these standards opens up substantial opportunities for development throughout the value chain.

Due to the impact of ESG considerations within the value creation process, transfer pricing plays a key role and cannot be left out.

This article explores the relationship between transfer pricing and ESG, and how its interconnection can help to foster a more sustainable approach within multinational groups.

Functional, assets, and risk analysis

Companies should conduct a comprehensive assessment of sustainable development goals. This usually involves the creation of a sustainability risk exposure map throughout the value chain, taking into account a company's geographic presence and key markets risk (focusing on environmental risks, risks related to governance issues, or social-related risks).

Furthermore, it is important to understand the contributions made by the company throughout its process and whether they are aligned or misaligned with sustainable development goals.

Considering the above, transfer pricing policies and documentation need to adapt and cope with ESG considerations.

Functional, assets, and risk analysis requires a detailed ESG analysis, so as to clearly identify:

  • New transactions deriving from ESG topics;

  • Potential changes to the company business model;

  • The potential impact on, or changes to, the brand value or intangible property of the company; and

  • Changes to the value chain operating models.

Functional analysis

The scope of the functional analysis should include the evaluation of ESG-related functions conducted by each entity, such as:

  • The identification and documentation of tasks related to environmental conservation;

  • Social impact;

  • Corporate governance compliance with environmental regulations;

  • Sustainability reporting; and

  • Employee welfare programmes.

The functional analysis will need to determine whether the costs incurred by one or more entities in the group provide benefits to other companies in the group. In such a case, a recharge of such cost, plus an arm’s-length mark-up, should be evaluated.

Assets

In terms of assets employed, it is essential to identify the tangible and intangible resources that play a role in generating value within the ESG area, which might include:

  • A change to renewable energy infrastructure;

  • Patented sustainable technologies;

  • Trademarks associated with environmentally friendly products; or

  • A company's reputation for ethical business conduct.

Investments in ESG activities will be able to bring benefits to the value of the group's intangible assets as well. In such cases, a detailed DEMPE analysis could help in the allocation of profits or costs between the group’s companies.

Risk

It is important to focus on the identification and evaluation of the potential influence of ESG-related risks on the financial performance and value generation of companies within a group. ESG-associated risks might relate to:

  • Climate change;

  • Ethical considerations within the supply chain; and

  • Regulatory compliance in ESG-related sectors.

Traditionally, these risks could be collectively categorised as reputational risk.

The implementation of ESG initiatives cannot be conducted in a siloed environment within a company or a group, considering its impact on a company’s profit allocation and transfer pricing model.

An Italian perspective

Italy, like many countries, has been integrating ESG principles into its business landscape.

Companies operating in Italy are expected to align their transfer pricing policies with ESG goals, not only to comply with regulatory requirements but also to contribute positively to the environment, society, and governance in the country, and avoid potential risk exposure.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
Gift this article