China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
finance

Lewis Lu of KPMG China discusses the recent developments in advance tax rulings in Shanghai as the country moves towards greater tax transparency and certainty

China has been taking steps towards creating a more transparent and predictable tax environment by actively developing its advance tax ruling (ATR) system. A milestone was reached on December 29 2023, when the Shanghai tax authority introduced the Interim Measures for the Administration of Advance Tax Ruling, aimed at governing the ATR system in Shanghai.

Distinctive aspects of the Shanghai ATR system include the following.

Scope of applicability

The Shanghai ATR system extends to all enterprises within Shanghai, regardless of size. This is in contrast to other regions in China, where the ATR system is presently reserved for large enterprises.

Excluded tax matters

Certain tax matters fall outside the purview of ATR. This covers instances where the company does not plan to implement the transaction (for which certainty is sought) within two years, and consequently lacks a detailed project plan. Also excluded are matters or arrangements that lack reasonable business purposes, are already covered by existing tax laws/regulations, or that fall into categories specifically excluded from obtaining rulings.

Application process

Enterprises seeking an ATR can submit their application materials to the Shanghai local tax authority responsible for large enterprise tax matters, either at the municipal or district level. These materials include the application form, informed consent, and supporting evidence documents. Comprehensive details – including the nature of the ruling, the applicant’s position, and the impact on production and taxation – are crucial for a successful application.

Examination and ruling

The accepting tax authority may conduct on-site investigations to ensure compliance with set criteria. In cases related to advanced pricing rulings, the international tax department of the tax authority takes charge.

The measures outline a timeframe for examination, with the primary opinion expected within 30 days of the working group receiving the application, and the leading group’s response within 10 days of receiving the primary opinion. The timeframe for issuing the ruling is yet to be clarified in the measure.

Follow-up administration

The overseeing tax authority will monitor subsequent developments and provide services and management based on the applicant's actual business activities. In the case of significant changes in the ruled matters or alterations in the laws forming the basis of the ruling, the overseeing tax authority can recommend termination or revocation. The applicant must inform the overseeing tax authority of substantial changes within 30 days. The option to reapply for an ATR for anticipated matters is available to the applicant.

Force of law

It is crucial to understand that ATRs are personalised tax services for enterprises and do not constitute administrative acts affecting substantial rights and obligations. ATR results are not applicable for administrative reconsideration or litigation.

Final thoughts on Shanghai’s ATR system

The Shanghai ATR system is expected to benefit a broader range of taxpayers, particularly multinational enterprises, and the top 500 enterprises located in Shanghai (both foreign and Chinese). Given the increasing operational complexity faced by these enterprises, enhancing tax certainty is deemed essential. In parallel, the new Shanghai measure aligns with the Chinese tax authority's commitment to better serve taxpayers.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
Gift this article