China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Shanghai tax authority enhances the advance tax ruling system

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
finance

Lewis Lu of KPMG China discusses the recent developments in advance tax rulings in Shanghai as the country moves towards greater tax transparency and certainty

China has been taking steps towards creating a more transparent and predictable tax environment by actively developing its advance tax ruling (ATR) system. A milestone was reached on December 29 2023, when the Shanghai tax authority introduced the Interim Measures for the Administration of Advance Tax Ruling, aimed at governing the ATR system in Shanghai.

Distinctive aspects of the Shanghai ATR system include the following.

Scope of applicability

The Shanghai ATR system extends to all enterprises within Shanghai, regardless of size. This is in contrast to other regions in China, where the ATR system is presently reserved for large enterprises.

Excluded tax matters

Certain tax matters fall outside the purview of ATR. This covers instances where the company does not plan to implement the transaction (for which certainty is sought) within two years, and consequently lacks a detailed project plan. Also excluded are matters or arrangements that lack reasonable business purposes, are already covered by existing tax laws/regulations, or that fall into categories specifically excluded from obtaining rulings.

Application process

Enterprises seeking an ATR can submit their application materials to the Shanghai local tax authority responsible for large enterprise tax matters, either at the municipal or district level. These materials include the application form, informed consent, and supporting evidence documents. Comprehensive details – including the nature of the ruling, the applicant’s position, and the impact on production and taxation – are crucial for a successful application.

Examination and ruling

The accepting tax authority may conduct on-site investigations to ensure compliance with set criteria. In cases related to advanced pricing rulings, the international tax department of the tax authority takes charge.

The measures outline a timeframe for examination, with the primary opinion expected within 30 days of the working group receiving the application, and the leading group’s response within 10 days of receiving the primary opinion. The timeframe for issuing the ruling is yet to be clarified in the measure.

Follow-up administration

The overseeing tax authority will monitor subsequent developments and provide services and management based on the applicant's actual business activities. In the case of significant changes in the ruled matters or alterations in the laws forming the basis of the ruling, the overseeing tax authority can recommend termination or revocation. The applicant must inform the overseeing tax authority of substantial changes within 30 days. The option to reapply for an ATR for anticipated matters is available to the applicant.

Force of law

It is crucial to understand that ATRs are personalised tax services for enterprises and do not constitute administrative acts affecting substantial rights and obligations. ATR results are not applicable for administrative reconsideration or litigation.

Final thoughts on Shanghai’s ATR system

The Shanghai ATR system is expected to benefit a broader range of taxpayers, particularly multinational enterprises, and the top 500 enterprises located in Shanghai (both foreign and Chinese). Given the increasing operational complexity faced by these enterprises, enhancing tax certainty is deemed essential. In parallel, the new Shanghai measure aligns with the Chinese tax authority's commitment to better serve taxpayers.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article