Guide to Poland’s filing obligations for real estate companies and their shareholders

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guide to Poland’s filing obligations for real estate companies and their shareholders

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
home loan officer uses a calculator with a house plan loan real estate or property.

Łukasz Kupień of MDDP addresses the tricky question of which real estate companies and shareholders in such entities are required to submit information to Polish tax offices, and what that entails

Polish real estate companies and their shareholders are required to submit the following information by April 2 2024:

  • Real estate companies are mandated to disclose information about entities that directly or indirectly hold shares or similar rights in that real estate company, and about the percentage and number of such shares held by each shareholder; and

  • Shareholders (partners) in real estate companies who are taxpayers and hold at least 5% of the shares or similar rights in a real estate company are mandated to disclose information about the percentage and number of their shares or similar rights, held directly or indirectly, in real estate companies.

The submission of this information has to be conducted electronically through official forms. Real estate companies are to use forms CIT-N1 and PIT-N1, while their shareholders are to use forms CIT-N2 and PIT-N2. All submissions are to be made to the pertinent tax office.

Failure to submit the required information, a delay in filing, or providing inaccurate information may lead to penal and fiscal consequences.

There are a number of practical doubts when applying these provisions. For example, it is not clear:

  • If, and which, indirect shareholders have the reporting obligations;

  • Whether shareholders who are reporting have an obligation to register for a Polish tax number; and

  • How a Polish real estate company should collect data about its indirect shareholders who are several levels above in the corporate structure.

Definition of a real estate company

A real estate company is an entity that meets all the following criteria:

  • It is not an individual;

  • It possesses real estate situated in Poland, directly or indirectly, with a value surpassing PLN 10 million;

  • The value of these real estate assets constitutes at least 50% of the entity's overall asset value; and

  • At least 60% of its revenues are derived from the rental, lease, leasing, or sale of real estate or rights to real estate, shares in other real estate companies, or the sale of such companies (this condition does not apply to entities in the first year of their operations).

As a result, a non-Polish holding company that received dividends from its Polish real estate companies or that sold such companies may also meet these conditions and have reporting obligations in Poland.

Who must submit the information?

The above information must be submitted by:

  • Real estate companies; and

  • Taxpayers holding shares or similar rights in real estate companies, directly or indirectly, granting them a minimum of 5% of the voting rights, profit-sharing rights in a partnership, or a collective sum of participation titles or similar rights.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
Gift this article