Guide to Poland’s filing obligations for real estate companies and their shareholders

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guide to Poland’s filing obligations for real estate companies and their shareholders

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
home loan officer uses a calculator with a house plan loan real estate or property.

Łukasz Kupień of MDDP addresses the tricky question of which real estate companies and shareholders in such entities are required to submit information to Polish tax offices, and what that entails

Polish real estate companies and their shareholders are required to submit the following information by April 2 2024:

  • Real estate companies are mandated to disclose information about entities that directly or indirectly hold shares or similar rights in that real estate company, and about the percentage and number of such shares held by each shareholder; and

  • Shareholders (partners) in real estate companies who are taxpayers and hold at least 5% of the shares or similar rights in a real estate company are mandated to disclose information about the percentage and number of their shares or similar rights, held directly or indirectly, in real estate companies.

The submission of this information has to be conducted electronically through official forms. Real estate companies are to use forms CIT-N1 and PIT-N1, while their shareholders are to use forms CIT-N2 and PIT-N2. All submissions are to be made to the pertinent tax office.

Failure to submit the required information, a delay in filing, or providing inaccurate information may lead to penal and fiscal consequences.

There are a number of practical doubts when applying these provisions. For example, it is not clear:

  • If, and which, indirect shareholders have the reporting obligations;

  • Whether shareholders who are reporting have an obligation to register for a Polish tax number; and

  • How a Polish real estate company should collect data about its indirect shareholders who are several levels above in the corporate structure.

Definition of a real estate company

A real estate company is an entity that meets all the following criteria:

  • It is not an individual;

  • It possesses real estate situated in Poland, directly or indirectly, with a value surpassing PLN 10 million;

  • The value of these real estate assets constitutes at least 50% of the entity's overall asset value; and

  • At least 60% of its revenues are derived from the rental, lease, leasing, or sale of real estate or rights to real estate, shares in other real estate companies, or the sale of such companies (this condition does not apply to entities in the first year of their operations).

As a result, a non-Polish holding company that received dividends from its Polish real estate companies or that sold such companies may also meet these conditions and have reporting obligations in Poland.

Who must submit the information?

The above information must be submitted by:

  • Real estate companies; and

  • Taxpayers holding shares or similar rights in real estate companies, directly or indirectly, granting them a minimum of 5% of the voting rights, profit-sharing rights in a partnership, or a collective sum of participation titles or similar rights.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The proposed Block TP Assessment could provide taxpayers with long-term arm’s-length price certainty and reduce admin headaches, Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co writes
India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Gift this article