Implementation of pillar two transitional safe harbours in Italy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Implementation of pillar two transitional safe harbours in Italy

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_crowe_valente.jpg
Venice

Federico Vincenti and Carola Valente of Valente Associati GEB Partners/Crowe Valente provide a guide to Italy’s transitional country-by-country reporting safe harbours for groups within the scope of the pillar two global minimum tax requirements

On December 27 2023, the Italian government enacted Legislative Decree No. 209, with the aim of reforming certain provisions of the Italian international tax law framework to better align it with international best practices.

The decree also contains rules for the implementation of Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523, which introduces the pillar two rules.

On May 20 2024, the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance issued a decree implementing transitional country-by-country reporting safe harbours for groups subject to the pillar two global minimum tax requirements.

The decree provides significant simplifications for calculating the additional tax owed by multinational or domestic groups to mitigate the administrative and compliance burden of the global minimum tax. These simplifications primarily involve using accounting data from the country-by-country reports (CbCRs) instead of the data resulting from the application of the GloBE rules to determine the relevant income and relevant taxes.

The ‘transitional period’, in accordance with OECD rules, includes tax periods that begin on or before December 31 2026, and does not include any tax period that ends after June 30 2028. In practice, for entities with a tax period coinciding with the calendar year, this corresponds to the years 2024–26 for the income inclusion rule and the years 2025–2026 for the undertaxed payments rule.

Simplified tax calculation rules and the transitional safe harbour

The simplified rules can be applied if at least one of the following tests is passed:

  • The de minimis test – this criterion is satisfied if the multinational or domestic group, as a whole, has total revenues of less than €10 million and a profit before taxes of less than €1 million, or a loss before taxes;

  • The simplified effective tax rate test – this is satisfied if the multinational or domestic group has an effective group tax rate (calculated as the ratio of simplified relevant taxes to profit before taxes) that is at least equal to the so-called transitional tax rate (15% for tax periods beginning in 2023 or 2024, 16% for tax periods beginning in 2025, and 17% for tax periods beginning in 2026); and/or

  • The routine profit test – this is satisfied if the group's profit before taxes does not exceed the amount of the substance base income exclusion for enterprises located in a specific country.

Under the simplified rules, if at least one of the above-mentioned tests is passed in a given jurisdiction, the latter will be considered a low-risk jurisdiction and the group’s top-up tax will be equal to zero.

The option for the transitional safe harbour, according to Article 6 of the implementing decree, is exercised in the so-called relevant communication and is effective for one year, unless renewed, with reference to the country for which it was exercised.

The CbCR must be prepared using ‘qualified financial statements’, which include:

  • The financial statements used by the parent company to prepare the consolidated financial statements;

  • Individual financial statements prepared in accordance with, or authorised by, accounting principles; or

  • For companies not consolidated line by line, the financial statements of the companies used for the CbCR.

For multinational groups not required to prepare a CbCR (for example, domestic groups that are subject to the global minimum tax rules), it is necessary to refer to the data contained in the qualified financial statements that would have been reported in the CbCR if the group had been required to prepare it.

The decree also introduces anti-avoidance rules aimed at stopping a multinational group from meeting one of the above-mentioned tests by exploiting hybrid arbitrage arrangements.

Within 36 months from the date on which the option was exercised, the tax authorities may serve an information request on the correct application of the provisions of the decree on the reporting enterprise or the designated local enterprise, or jointly controlled enterprises and entities located in Italy whose tax liability is assumed to be zero as a result of the simplified rules.

The entities must provide the necessary information within the six-month period from the notification of the request. If the entities fail to provide the required information within the time limit or the information provided shows the commission of a significant error, the simplified transitional arrangements under this decree shall not apply.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Gregor McMillan of Howden explains how insurance-backed financing can help businesses and funds unlock liquidity from tax receivables and other contingent claims
The arrival of Alex Anderson swiftly follows that of funds tax specialist Stuart Alter and suggests the Tier 3-ranked firm has higher ambitions
One of the two appointments is EY’s Gordon McIntosh, who becomes the big four firm’s second senior tax departure in September
Balson's move from a Tier 1 practice to a Tier 3 competitor looks counterintuitive. The market data suggests it is anything but
Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Gift this article