Australia: New double tax treaty with Slovenia and foreign resident CGT withholding amendments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: New double tax treaty with Slovenia and foreign resident CGT withholding amendments

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Sydney

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper Australia summarises Australia’s latest proposed double tax agreement as the country’s treaty reforms gather pace, and potential changes to the non-resident capital gains tax withholding rate and threshold

The Australian government released details of the proposed new double tax treaty with the Republic of Slovenia on September 9 2024. While Slovenia is one of Australia’s smaller trading partners, the proposed treaty provides further evidence of Australia's tax policy with respect to the extensive treaty reform process, including critical aspects such as the limitation of benefits article (Article 28) and specific reference in the attached protocol to the treaty to incorporate Australian integrity or anti-avoidance provisions, including thin capitalisation, dividend stripping, and transfer pricing.

Following the enactment of a similar double tax treaty with Iceland in 2023, the key aspects of the treaty with Slovenia can be summarised as follows:

  • An introductory objects clause dealing with purported tax evasion or avoidance, including through treaty-shopping arrangements;

  • A concessional dividend withholding tax of 5% (where at least a 10% voting interest in an Australian company is held) or generally 10% withholding in Australia or Slovenia (subject to franking benefits in Australia);

  • A 5% interest withholding tax limit on interest derived by financial institutions; otherwise, potentially 0% for certain government entities and recognised pension funds, or 10% withholding;

  • A 10% withholding tax on royalties;

  • A comprehensive non-discrimination clause and exchange of information clause, and assistance with the collection of taxes;

  • A mutual agreement procedure, including prescribed protocols for submission and conducting arbitration, as outlined in Article 13 of the protocol to the Slovenia treaty; and

  • A limitation of benefits article based on best practice, as outlined in the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument; i.e., where it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that obtaining a benefit under the treaty was one of the principal purposes of the arrangement that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit, the benefit may not be granted under the treaty (for example, reduced withholding taxes).

The proposed new Slovenia–Australia double tax treaty is expected to progress through each country's parliament and to enter into law in the coming months.

Australia has an extensive treaty renewal and/or expansion programme, including proposed new treaties with Luxembourg, Greece, and Brazil, where initial progress has been made and further progress is expected in the coming months. Furthermore, the Australian Taxation Office has recently released synthesised texts for, among others, the Spanish, Vietnamese, and Thai treaties.

Foreign resident CGT withholding tax

As indicated, the government introduced legislation into the Australian Parliament on September 12 2024 that will:

  • Change the existing non-resident capital gains tax (CGT) withholding regime in Subdivision 14-D of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 to increase the withholding tax rate to 15% from 12.5%; and

  • Remove the existing withholding threshold (i.e., A$750,000).

These amendments are intended to apply to acquisitions made on or after January 1 2025 (at the latest).

The above amendments do not cover the reforms announced in July 2024 that deal with, among other things, extending the potential application of Australian non-resident CGT to a broader range of economic interests in taxable Australian real property (including via indirect interests).

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
Gift this article