New Dutch transfer tax rules for real estate companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Dutch transfer tax rules for real estate companies

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
pexels-igor-passchier-111147847-23203534.jpg

The application of real estate transfer tax to share acquisitions in real estate companies is set to become more frequent. Luca van Silfhout of DLA Piper Netherlands discusses the changes and suggests a mitigating strategy

As of January 1 2025, the acquisition of shares in Dutch real estate companies will be subject to real estate transfer tax (RETT) more often. Since RETT is non-recoverable, this directly impacts business cases.

The implementing legislation is especially relevant for newly built residential projects and any real estate leased out exempt from VAT.

The Dutch RETT system

The Dutch RETT levy on the acquisition of Dutch real estate applies at a general rate of 10.4%. A lowered rate of 2% applies (only) to the acquisition of a residence by its prospective resident homeowner. Furthermore, RETT legislation allows for multiple exemptions and facilities to cater for situations such as intragroup reorganisations, (de)mergers, and the acquisition of newly built real estate, all subject to conditions.

The Dutch RETT system closely interacts with Dutch VAT legislation (the latter being based on the European VAT system), whereby in most cases a transaction involving Dutch real estate is taxed with RETT or VAT – only rarely are both types of taxes due. On occasion, neither is due.

Real estate companies

The acquisition of shares may also be subject to RETT if the entity qualifies as a real estate company. Before, the RETT exemption for newly built real estate applied (more or less) similarly to acquisitions of property in an asset deal as it did in a share deal. As of January 1 2025, this will change.

The current situation

A typical situation where neither VAT nor RETT was due involves the sale and transfer of shares in a real estate company owning newly built real estate. If the real estate in question involves residential real estate (leased out long term to residents), a comparable sale and transfer of the asset would have been taxed with (non-deductible) VAT at a 21% rate. This discrepancy in the tax burden at a real estate project level was deemed unwanted and is targeted by the newly implemented legislation.

Planned changes

In principle, the acquisition of shares in a real estate company holding newly developed real estate will be subject to a newly introduced 4% RETT rate. This rate is said to best approximate a tax burden on the underlying real estate project as if it had been transferred in an asset deal. The RETT exemption for newly built properties will, however, continue to apply if 90% or more of the underlying real estate’s use is such that the owner is allowed to deduct VAT for at least two years. Note that this requires investors to perform extra bookkeeping for tax purposes.

A transitional law applies – subject to conditions, and only upon request – to projects that have been duly notified to the Dutch tax authorities prior to April 2 2024.

Before year's end

For planned share deals, it could be wise to see whether the legal transfer of the shares can be brought forward to take place this year to avoid the need for extra bookkeeping and/or additional taxation.

In situations where the parties can reach an agreement on the commercial terms but the buyer cannot get the financing in place before the end of the year, the following may be of interest. Dutch civil law provides for a legal transfer to take place in, for example, 2024, with payment of the purchase price at a later date, in 2025 (Groninger Akte). For RETT purposes, the acquisition takes place at the (earlier) time of the legal transfer (in 2024), allowing the current RETT regime to be taken advantage of, even though, financially, the deal will be finalised in 2025.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
Gift this article