VAT on online events to become a little easier to manage (really?)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

VAT on online events to become a little easier to manage (really?)

Sponsored by

logo.png
illuminated-3309188.jpg

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services says changes to the application of VAT concerning online events are intended to simplify the rules but could create further headaches

An article by Spanish VAT Services published in 2022 pointed out that determining the place of supply for VAT on online events has always been a controversial issue. Since participation in such events takes place via the internet, the event organiser and the participants could be located anywhere in the world. This circumstance can create significant complications for the determination of the VAT applicable to these services.

In this regard, articles 53 (B2B supplies) and 54 (B2C supplies) of the EU’s VAT Directive state that access to scientific, entertainment, educational, or other similar events should be taxed for VAT where the event is actually taking place. When speaking about an online event, it is not always easy to determine the place where the event is taking place. In fact, in some cases it can be tremendously complex.

We have all attended online events where speakers connect from different parts of the world to do their presentations. The same goes for attendees, who can access the event from anywhere in the world. Things can be even more complicated if it is a hybrid event in which there are onsite and online attendees and speakers. In these cases, applying the provisions of articles 53 and 54 of the VAT Directive can certainly be complicated.

Changes to the application of VAT concerning online event fees

To clarify the application of VAT to the fees paid to access these types of events, Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 introduces brief but important modifications in articles 53 and 54 of the VAT Directive, effective from January 1 2025.

With regard to Article 53 of the VAT Directive, the following text is added: “This Article shall not apply to admission to the events referred to in the first paragraph where the attendance is virtual.”

Additionally, the following text is added to Article 54: “Where the services and ancillary services relate to activities which are streamed or otherwise made virtually available, the place of supply shall, however, be the place where the non-taxable person is established, has his permanent address or usually resides.”

The above implies that the destination principle applies in the case of online events irrespective of whether the attendees are VAT-able persons.

The following shall be considered by the organiser of an online event from 2025:

  • If the recipient is a taxable person, the supplier does not have to charge VAT to their customer when both are established in different EU member states (VAT will be reverse charged by the customer). In the event that the supplier and the recipient are established in the same member state, the supplier must charge domestic VAT.

  • Where the recipient is a private individual, the taxation for VAT will be in the member state where the person accessing the event is established or domiciled, with the supplier being obliged to charge the corresponding VAT to their customer. The supplier could make use of the One-Stop Shop return.

Complications and potential VAT headaches for online event organisers

The above points to a standard situation that can certainly occur in practice in many cases, but the truth is that, as commented above, additional complications may arise in cases where a hybrid event takes place, which is now common. In this case, the service provider may need to differentiate between one type of attendee and the other. For onsite attendees, the VAT to apply will be that of the country where the event is taking place, while for online attendees, the rules described above would apply.

The situation can be even more complicated, since all the above is applicable when we refer to ‘events’. Although it may seem obvious, a priori, the truth is that this, like many things in VAT, has been the subject of discussion and controversy.

Following the European Court of Justice case C-647/17 (Srf Konsulterna), the VAT Committee agreed that these types of activities should be considered events as long as their duration is not excessive (one week is given as a guideline). In other words, the longer the duration is, the less likely it is to qualify as an event.

If we are not dealing with an event, none of the above applies and we should, therefore, apply the general VAT provisions; namely, those established in articles 44 and 45 of the VAT Directive. As we can see, when organising an online event, you must make a series of decisions if you do not want VAT to become a true headache.

VAT and online events… Who said it would be easy?

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Shapley would be the fourth person to hold the job this year; in other news, UK tax advisory firm MHA raised fewer funds than expected from its London IPO
The US needs to be involved in pillar one for there to be more international acceptance of the project, Michael Masciangelo says
The UK regulator is investigating EY’s auditing of the national postal service as it relates to the high-profile Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted
The directive will extend cooperation and information exchange around pillar two, according to the Council of the EU
Audit engagement partner Christopher Voogd has also been hit with a £32,500 charge over the firm’s work with Stirling Water Seafield Finance
China’s largest overhaul of its tax administration system in 24 years, featuring enhanced enforcement powers, is underway, says Abe Zhao of FenXun Partners
However, the US president increased tariffs on imported Chinese goods to 125%; in other news, UK tax firm MHA expects to raise £102m from its London listing
A mere three firms accounted for more than 90% of top-up taxes paid, according to research from Deloitte
Taxpayers with Brazilian operations should revisit their withholding positions in light of updated US guidance, writes Rafael Benevides, senior tax counsel at Meta
The MEGlobal Canada decision highlights taxpayers’ frustrations over split jurisdiction for TP assessments as well as a need for legislative reform, one expert tells ITR
Gift this article