Spanish media production and performing arts: a tax reward for supporting culture

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spanish media production and performing arts: a tax reward for supporting culture

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-garrigues.png
Silhouetted arts performers

Javier de Rojas and Jose Ignacio Ripoll of Garrigues Madrid explain how producers and financers are increasingly taking advantage of Spain's clarified tax credit system for film, audiovisual, and live performance financing

Effective from January 1 2021, the Spanish Corporate Income Tax Law was amended to introduce a mechanism allowing taxpayers who participate in the financing of film productions, audiovisual series, and live performing arts and music shows to apply the tax credits generated by the producer. This allows a return to be obtained that is legally limited to 20% of the amount of the financing provided (gross return).

Contrary to the general rule that establishes the unavailability of tax credits, this mechanism allows, subject to certain requirements and limits, the tax credit generated by the producer to be transferred to the financer. The tax credits resulting from the activity to be promoted can therefore be used by a taxpayer (the financer, in this case) and this gives the taxpayer who is carrying out the activity – i.e., the producer – access to additional funds potentially needed for the production.

The novelty of this mechanism created initial uncertainties as to its correct application, which, in the absence of specific doctrine, had to be resolved by applying the general logic of the tax and resorting to the interpretation of similar mechanisms that, in previous years, had been incorporated into provincial legislation (the Basque Country and Navarre).

However, the Spanish Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) has carried out intense interpretative work since the mechanism has been in place, which has clarified most of the doubts and provided a framework of legal certainty that makes this incentive attractive and is leading to a significant increase in its use. Two notable issues that have been resolved are:

  • The financial role of funds provided; and

  • Guarantees for the financer.

The financial role of funds provided

The rules that apply to the mechanism initially left doubt as to how to interpret the financial role to be played by any funds provided.

In this regard, a legislative reform introduced in December 2022 clarified that as long as the funds are provided before obtaining the nationality and cultural character certificates necessary for the tax credit to be generated (the time limit established by the rules), they may be provided before or after the producer incurs the production costs. This seemed to open the door to the funds being able to be used to settle trade payables; i.e., accounts payable previously incurred for services received.

Elaborating on this financial role of the funds provided, at the end of 2023 the DGT issued binding ruling No. V2535-23, which, in addition to expressly confirming that such contributions could be used to cover trade accounts payable, clarified that the financing may also be used to settle financial liabilities incurred to cover all, or part of, the costs of production.

Guarantees for the financer

Closely related to the financial role of the funds explained above, financers were requesting, as security for their contribution, the provision of guarantees covering at least the period between the disbursement until completion of the production and the relevant certificates being obtained. This generated costs that, although initially assumed by the producer, ended up being shared with the financer via a reduction in the profitability offered.

On September 6 2024, in binding ruling No. V1928-24, the DGT clarified that the contribution of funds to an escrow account whose release (access by the producer) is conditional on obtaining the relevant certificates is a valid contribution for the purposes of the generation and application of this mechanism, even if the producer's effective access to the funds is deferred until the certificates are obtained.

Final thoughts on the mechanism

These examples of interpretations issued by the DGT allow for a more precise delimitation of the material scope of the mechanism, defining a sphere of action endowed with greater legal certainty, flexibility, and simplicity. This makes the incentive more attractive for producers, who can exchange potentially unusable tax credits for fully available cash funds, and financers, who can obtain a return on their cash surpluses within a better-defined legal framework.

In this context, the instrument is an effective government mechanism for promoting a key cultural activity such as the one underlying the tax credit.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Australia’s conservative opposition will repeal controversial tax agent reporting rules if elected in the country’s May general election
Shapley would be the fourth person to hold the job this year; in other news, UK tax advisory firm MHA raised fewer funds than expected from its London IPO
The US needs to be involved in pillar one for there to be more international acceptance of the project, Michael Masciangelo says
The UK regulator is investigating EY’s auditing of the national postal service as it relates to the high-profile Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds wrongfully convicted
The directive will extend cooperation and information exchange around pillar two, according to the Council of the EU
Audit engagement partner Christopher Voogd has also been hit with a £32,500 charge over the firm’s work with Stirling Water Seafield Finance
China’s largest overhaul of its tax administration system in 24 years, featuring enhanced enforcement powers, is underway, says Abe Zhao of FenXun Partners
However, the US president increased tariffs on imported Chinese goods to 125%; in other news, UK tax firm MHA expects to raise £102m from its London listing
A mere three firms accounted for more than 90% of top-up taxes paid, according to research from Deloitte
Taxpayers with Brazilian operations should revisit their withholding positions in light of updated US guidance, writes Rafael Benevides, senior tax counsel at Meta
Gift this article