Thailand enacts law to support the collection of 15% global minimum tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Thailand enacts law to support the collection of 15% global minimum tax

Sponsored by

hlb-thailand-2.png
Bangkok

Paul Ashburn and Anna Selina De Vera of HLB Thailand say the decree underlines the country’s commitment to pillar two implementation as Thailand aims to become one of the first two Southeast Asian countries to join the OECD

Thailand enacted the Emergency Decree on Top-Up Tax (the Decree) on December 26 2024 to support the collection of a global minimum tax of 15% from large multinational enterprises.

The Decree takes effect from January 1 2025 and is part of the country’s commitment to align with pillar two of the OECD’s global anti-base erosion (GloBE) model rules (the GloBE Model Rules). The move comes at a time when Thailand and Indonesia have commenced accession discussions to join the OECD and become the first member countries from Southeast Asia.

Businesses liable to top-up tax

An entity located in Thailand will be subject to tax under the Decree if it is a member of a multinational enterprise (MNE) that has consolidated group revenues of €750 million or more for at least two of the four preceding financial years.

The Thailand Board of Investment (BOI) estimates that up to 1,000 companies in the country could be affected, most of which would be foreign companies.

The top-up tax framework

The top-up tax is the difference between the effective tax rate (ETR) for all group entities in a jurisdiction (constituent entities, or CEs) and the global minimum tax rate of 15%.

Sections 28–41 of the Decree further specify the top-up tax liability calculation, which aligns with the approach taken in the GloBE Model Rules. Thailand has opted to introduce domestic top-up taxes on resident taxpayers. Thai CEs will be liable to pay the top-up tax if the computed ETR falls below the 15% global minimum tax rate threshold.

Income inclusion rules have been adopted, so that the ultimate parent entity (UPE) in Thailand, or other parent entities in the group, will be liable to pay the top-up tax for CEs in low-taxed jurisdictions (i.e., those in which the ETR is below 15%).

As a backstop to ensure in-scope MNEs pay a global minimum tax rate of 15%, Thai CEs will be liable to pay the top-up tax obligations of their MNE arising in low-taxed foreign jurisdictions that remain unpaid. The allocation to the Thai entities shall be in proportion to their calculated GloBE income.

Subject to certain conditions, the CEs in Thailand may agree to designate a single entity to assume and pay their top-up tax liability to the Revenue Department. All entities will remain jointly liable for any outstanding top-up taxes in this scenario.

Compliance requirements

Thai CEs shall submit the following information to the Revenue Department within 15 months from the last day of the UPE’s accounting period:

  • Notification of the Thai CEs containing information on its UPE, the country where the UPE is located, and the designated CE responsible for filing the GloBE information return (GIR). In the case that all CEs within Thailand designate a single Thai CE to file the notification on their behalf, individual notifications would not be required. The assigned Thai CE shall then notify the Revenue Department of the names of the Thai CEs that assigned it, along with their respective tax identification numbers, together with the required information.

  • The GIR, unless the return has already been filed by the UPE or a designated filing entity in a jurisdiction that has an automatic exchange of information agreement with Thailand.

  • A top-up tax return, along with the top-up tax liability payment, if any.

The deadline is extended from 15 months to 18 months for the first year that an MNE falls within the scope of the Decree.

Impact on the Thai economy

The Decree’s enactment signifies the country’s ongoing efforts to adhere to the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS to tackle tax avoidance, improve the coherence of international tax rules, and ensure a more transparent tax environment.

Thailand plans to allocate between 50% and 70% of the additional tax collected under the Decree to its National Competitiveness Enhancement for Target Industries Fund.

The BOI announced investment promotion measures in 2023 to alleviate the impact on in-scope entities that receive BOI-promotion tax incentives while still enabling Thailand to maintain its ability to attract existing and new investors.

These measures allow eligible entities to pay tax at the rate of 50% of the normal tax rate, for a period not exceeding two times the corporate income tax exemption and tax reduction period granted by the BOI, but, in any case, not exceeding 10 years in total.

The Revenue Department will be responsible for proposing additional laws and setting operational guidelines as appropriate to collect the top-up tax, in accordance with standards established by the OECD.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Gift this article