New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
A series of important changes are imminent

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners consider the impact of the innovative provisions brought forward by October 2019’s law decree.

The Law Decree no. 124 of October 26 2019 (published in the Italian Official Gazette no. 252 dated October 26 2019), has set out a number of new tax provisions. The new provisions are immediately effective, but will have to be converted into law by the Italian Parliament by December 25 2019 to become final.

Prohibition on the set-off of tax credits in the event of tax debt assumption 


The previous tax codes had provided for the assumption of third party tax debts without exempting the original tax debtor from tax liability. The tax decree amends the law and sets forth that the party who assumes the debt is excluded from the use of its own tax credits to offset the due payments.



Limit for set-off credits – exceeds €5,000 

The new provisions widen the existing rules concerning the set-off payments in respect to VAT credits by extending it to encompass other types of taxes such as direct and substitute. Credits in regard to direct taxes exceeding €5,000 can be used as set-off payments only after the tenth day following the filing of the income tax return or the request from which such tax credit emerges. 



Tax evasion criminal thresholds 

The new decree imposes stricter penalties and lower criminal thresholds for tax evasion. For the offence of filing a false tax return, the amount for the potential evaded tax has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000), while the under-declared taxable base has been cut to €2 million (from €3 million). Meanwhile, the criminalisation threshold for withholding taxes resulting from a tax return or a certificate has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000); and for failing to pay VAT is reduced to €150,000 (from €250,000). Furthermore, the provision that had previously excluded the criminalisation of evaluations that differ by less than 10% from the correct amount has been repealed.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In-house teams who want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Gift this article