Cryptocurrency transactions fall on to the Brazilian Federal Revenue’s radar

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cryptocurrency transactions fall on to the Brazilian Federal Revenue’s radar

Sponsored by

pinheirologo.png
1e1d81ed-c359-4e45-a5e5-0304b912e60c19-digital-economy-we-need-to-talk-about-platforms.jpg

Ricardo Luiz Becker and Fabio Tarandach of Pinheiro Neto explore how tax authorities are quickly evolving to regulate Brazil’s surging cryptocurrency market.

Just like several countries across the world, cryptocurrency transactions in Brazil have become increasingly important day by day. Whether as a new form of payment (as a substitute to the conventional payment types such as cash or cards), or whether as a form of investment (given the valuation of the cryptocurrency unit), the fact is that cryptocurrency transactions have grown to earn relevance in the Brazilian market.

Brazilian tax law has no legal specific act concerning the taxation of cryptocurrency operations, so transactions involving virtual currencies are currently subject to the same taxation as transactions with different classes of assets. The taxation will follow the set guidelines: (1) the revenue obtained with the settlement in cryptocurrency should be regularly taxed; (2) an entity that settles an obligation with the use of cryptocurrencies should withhold the applicable taxes; and (3) the capital gains earned with the sale of cryptocurrency should be taxed as well.




Nevertheless, until a few months ago, there was no rule foreseeing how these transactions should be brought to the attention of the authorities. Thus in practical terms, the Federal Revenue did not have the resources or tools to collect taxes over these transactions. Since cryptocurrency transactions were becoming more valuable, the Brazilian Federal Revenue (RFB) chose not to ignore this situation.



In this sense, the RFB issued the Normative Instruction Nº 1,888/19 (IN 1,888/19) which determines that all cryptocurrency transactions are properly informed to the authorities by Brazilian exchange brokerage firms (exchanges), by individuals or legal entities owning the crypto assets, depending on the case. 



There are many reporting requirements established under IN 1,888/19, such as date and number of encrypted transactions; description of individuals or companies that were parts in the transaction; type of cryptocurrency transferred; operation’s value; value of the service fees; and address of the delivery and receipt wallet. Moreover, a penalty of 3% is foreseen in cases in which the information provided to the authorities is inaccurate, incomplete or incorrect.



In our view, the new obligations (IN 1,888/19) bring a new perspective to Brazilian public finance and a new scenario to all the players of this market. In accordance to the last information provided by the RFB, in the first two months that the new rule has been in force, the total amount informed to the authorities was around BRL 14 billion. In other words, if the Brazilian tax authorities intend to keep up with controlling cryptocurrency transactions, and tax it, there will be a free way ahead.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article