Australia tightens rules on foreign investment

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia tightens rules on foreign investment

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
nut-165083-1280.jpg

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper summarises tax-related developments from early June 2020, as Australia takes a more stringent approach towards compliance procedures involving foreign investments.

On Friday, June 5 2020, the Australian Treasurer announced significant changes to Australia’s foreign investment policy/framework mainly driven by concerns regarding emerging national security risks and related developments. 

These foreign investment reforms follow upon certain temporary measures announced on March 29 2020 and will be the subject of exposure draft legislation expected to be released for consultation in July with a view to commencement of the new law from January 1 2021. 



Briefly, these reforms enable the Treasurer, amongst other things, to impose conditions or block investments by foreign persons on national security grounds and also to strengthen compliance measures, information sharing and enforcement powers, as well as provide certain administrative enhancements. 



Most particularly, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will increasingly provide a key role in administering, monitoring and implementing the enhanced foreign investment rules/framework, including maintaining a foreign investment register, additional access and information sharing powers with overseas counterpart agencies through various compliance activities – however consistent with Australia’s privacy and confidentiality laws. 



Client professional privilege 



Given the ATO’s recent well-publicised concerns with and actions on alleged excessive client professional privilege claims (as evidenced by the 2019 case with Glencore International and recent pursuit of certain professional firms), we would expect the continuing rigorous pursuit of taxpayer documentation in the coming months. 



Taxpayer alert



The ATO also released on May 25 2020 Taxpayer Alert 2020/2 dealing with the mischaracterisation of certain arrangements connected with foreign investment into Australian entities. The Taxpayer Alert deals with, amongst other things, cross border debt finance and certain arrangements minimising interest or royalty withholding tax in the context of the Australian/US double tax treaty and threatens the use of Australia’s general anti avoidance provision (Part IV A), diverted profits tax and related integrity measures. 



Hybrid mismatch rules – amendments 



Separately, new legislation was introduced into the Australian parliament on May 13 2020 dealing with certain clarifications to the Australian hybrid mismatch rules, including most particularly the integrity rule. Broadly, the integrity rule will be strengthened to ensure that it can apply to financing arrangements that have been designed to directly circumvent the operation of the hybrid mismatch rules. 



The new legislation when enacted will broaden the operation of the integrity rule to ensure that it could still apply in certain circumstances where the following specific hybrid mismatches arise; 

  • The deducting hybrid mismatch (which arises where two jurisdictions permit a deduction in relation to the same payment), and 

  • The hybrid financial instrument (a mismatch which exploits the tax treatment of a financial instrument, e.g. redeemable preference share). 


In addition, the new legislation also clarifies that in working out what constitutes ‘foreign income tax’ for the purposes of the integrity rule, any foreign municipal taxes and state taxes will also be taken into account to determine whether a payment has been subject to foreign tax at a rate of 10% or less.




Jock McCormack

T: +61 2 9286 8253

E: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com





more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two.
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
Gift this article