Business tax incentives announced in Australia’s 2021–2022 federal budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Business tax incentives announced in Australia’s 2021–2022 federal budget

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Significant business tax initiatives announced in Australia's 2021-2022 federal budget

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper highlights the key tax measures announced in Australia’s 2021–2022 federal budget.

Australia’s 2021–22 Federal Budget was delivered by the Australian Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, on May 11 2021 and includes several important business tax and related initiatives.  

Corporate collective investment vehicle

The proposed corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) regime which was first proposed in the 2016–17 budget will be implemented as a priority with an anticipated commencement date of July 1 2022.

The CCIV provides flow-through tax treatment and is intended to enhance the international competitiveness of the Australian managed funds industry by allowing fund managers to offer investment products using corporate vehicles which are more familiar ‘than trusts’ to overseas investors.  

The new CCIV regime is linked to the Asia region funds passport which will streamline and minimise the regulatory, legal and related approval processes in several Asia Pac countries including Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand and Thailand.

Also, the government has expanded the list of exchange of information countries to include an additional six countries that are eligible for concessional (15%) managed investment trust withholding tax.

Patent box regime

The government is introducing a new patent box tax regime which will encourage innovation with respect to developing medical and biotechnology patents, and possibly for the clean energy sector, from July 1 2022.  

A concessional effective corporate tax rate of 17% will be available from July 1 2022, which is significantly lower than the regular large company tax rate of 30%. To be eligible a patent must have been applied for after the budget announcement on May 11 2021, it must be granted and it must be Australian-owned.

Intangible assets

Taxpayers will be allowed to self-assess the effective lives of certain intangible assets including patents, registered designs, copyright and in-house software from July 1 2023.  This incentive should encourage business investment in these intangibles and related technology and allow businesses to accelerate the tax depreciation related thereto.

Temporary levy on offshore petroleum production

A new temporary levy will be imposed on offshore petroleum production to assist in recovering the costs of decommissioning the Laminaria-Corallina Oilfields and associated infrastructure.

Importantly, the temporary full expensing (instant asset write-off) and the temporary loss carry back measures were extended for another year.

Various sundry amendments/improvements were made to the employee share scheme rules, individual tax residency test, digital games tax offset, small brewers and distillers excise refund scheme, and superannuation.

It was pleasing to witness a greater focus on business tax incentives as well as further spending and other economic stimulus initiatives.

NSW Supreme Court

Also, in an important and broadly applicable decision (SPIC Pacific Hydro Pty Ltd v. Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWC 395), the NSW Supreme Court held that landholder duty was payable in NSW on the acquisition of a group that operated a windfarm on leased land.

In particular, the Hon Justice Anthony Payne decided that the wind turbine generators and meteorological or monitoring masts on the windfarm, along with related infrastructure, were ‘tenant’s fixtures’ and thus constituted a legal interest in land, on which landholder duty was payable.  

The concept of ‘tenant’s fixtures’ depends, among other things, on the intention and degree of annexation of the relevant plant and equipment, and also has broader potential income tax consequences, in addition to stamp duty.  The principles discussed in this case also have broader application to other plant and equipment and related infrastructure assets.

 

Jock McCormack

Partner, DLA Piper Australia

E: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article