Norway proposes new limited access to cross-border group contributions within the EEA

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway proposes new limited access to cross-border group contributions within the EEA

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The Norwegian government has proposed a new rule for cross-border group contributions

Heidi K Skovdahl and Inger Camilla U Gjeruldsen of Deloitte Norway explain the proposal for a new rule on cross-border group contributions, codifying the principles from EU/EEA law regarding ‘final loss’.

The Norwegian government has proposed a new rule for cross-border group contributions. The new rule codifies and clarifies existing practice which allows deductions for group contributions to companies within the European Economic Area (EEA) which has a ‘final loss’, subject to several limiting factors. The proposal is expected to be effective from income year 2021.

Background

As a starting point, the current Norwegian tax rules limits deductions for group contributions to those made to Norwegian companies. In 2017, the EFTA Court gave its advisory opinion to the Court of Appeal in the case E-15/16 Yara International ASA. The EFTA Court concluded that the Norwegian statutory rules were in breach of the EEA agreement in cases where a contribution to an EEA subsidiary covers a ‘final loss’ in the subsidiary. This was accepted by the Norwegian government and the Court of Appeal in the Yara case. 

Definition of ‘final loss’

The proposed new rule codifies the principles from the Yara case and clarifies the term ‘final loss’ in line with principles established under EU case law (e.g. the 2005 CJEU decision in case C-446/03 Marks & Spencer). According to the proposal, a loss is final when:

  • All options for using the loss have been exhausted (including past, present, and future periods), and the reason for the non-utilisation is due to the taxpayer’s specific facts and circumstances (i.e. not due to rules on expiration of losses or a lack of legal basis for using the loss);

  • The business activities in the subsidiary have ceased; and

  • A liquidation process for the foreign subsidiary has been initiated immediately following the year in which the loss is deducted (the liquidation process generally must be finalised within the same year as initiated).

Other requirements

The recipient must be an EEA resident company that has an actual establishment and carries out genuine business activities in the EEA state. Furthermore, the recipient must meet the general requirements for group contributions, that is more than 90% ownership and voting rights in the subsidiary on December 31 in the deduction year. Indirect ownership also fulfils the requirements if the foreign subsidiary is owned indirectly through an entity that is tax resident in Norway or in the foreign subsidiary’s residence state.

Limitation of deduction in certain circumstances

The government proposes several limitations of the deduction in the contributing company. 

First, the final loss must have been carried forward to, or occurred in, the income year in which the Norwegian parent company deducts the group contribution. 

Second, the loss must have arisen while the ownership and control requirements for group contributions were met. 

Third, the deductible amount is limited to the lower of the taxable loss under the rules of the foreign subsidiary’s residence state and the taxable loss the subsidiary would have had if it was subject to tax in Norway.

Fourth, the deduction is reduced correspondingly if the foreign subsidiary within the last five years has transferred or received assets or obligations with latent gains or losses, and such gains or losses has not been recognised as income or been deducted for tax purposes. 

Further considerations

Based on the wording of the current proposal, the new rule will only apply to a few cases. Taxpayers should therefore have a certain amount of loss before it is useful to check whether all the conditions are met. 

 

Heidi K Skovdahl

Associate, Deloitte Norway

E: heskovdahl@deloitte.no

 

Inger Camilla U Gjeruldsen 

Senior manager, Deloitte Norway

E: igjeruldsen@deloitte.no

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article